ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard

2010-06-24 14:48:03

On 24 jun 2010, at 20.26, Cyrus Daboo wrote:

I can certainly see where it would be useful. However, I question your 
comments in Section 9 of your draft: specifically that URI should be viewed 
as a replacement for SRV. URI (may) make sense for "resource" discovery, but 
I don't believe that is true for "service" discovery - I think SRV still 
makes the best sense for that


[not in context of the caldav draft...]

Hmm...you might be correct here. For example in the case of a URI RR that refer 
to a mailto URI that in turn (theoretically) should use SRV to know what port 
and hostname to use for the destination of the SMTP connection?

So a URI might in some cases in turn result in the need for an SRV lookup?

Is that your point?

   Patrik

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>