On 24 jun 2010, at 20.26, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
I can certainly see where it would be useful. However, I question your
comments in Section 9 of your draft: specifically that URI should be viewed
as a replacement for SRV. URI (may) make sense for "resource" discovery, but
I don't believe that is true for "service" discovery - I think SRV still
makes the best sense for that
[not in context of the caldav draft...]
Hmm...you might be correct here. For example in the case of a URI RR that refer
to a mailto URI that in turn (theoretically) should use SRV to know what port
and hostname to use for the destination of the SMTP connection?
So a URI might in some cases in turn result in the need for an SRV lookup?
Is that your point?
Patrik
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf