Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating C

On 6/24/10 1:47 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 24 jun 2010, at 20.26, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>
> > I can certainly see where it would be useful. However, I question
> > your comments in Section 9 of your draft: specifically that URI
> > should be viewed as a replacement for SRV. URI (may) make sense for
> > "resource" discovery, but I don't believe that is true for
> > "service" discovery - I think SRV still makes the best sense for
> > that
>
> [not in context of the caldav draft...]
>
> Hmm...you might be correct here. For example in the case of a URI RR
> that refer to a mailto URI that in turn (theoretically) should use
> SRV to know what port and hostname to use for the destination of the
> SMTP connection?
>
> So a URI might in some cases in turn result in the need for an SRV
> lookup?
That's often the case for xmpp URIs.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf