Bob -
Would it be possible to get two additional version of this chart?
1) Including only those who were nomcom eligible (3 of 5 of the last meetings)
at each meeting.
2) Including only those who were one of WG chair, document editor or author for
a an active document at that meeting (e.g. WG met and there were active IDs),
IESG/IAB
Its unclear to me whether the raw numbers are actually useful as they tend to
be fairly skewed by local attendees. That in itself isn't bad, but what I
think what we're looking for are long-term contributors/collaborators. I know
it may be difficult to assemble the above lists, but I believe the data does
exist electronically.
Thanks - Mike
At 04:44 PM 8/6/2010, Bob Hinden wrote:
During my IAOC chair plenary talk at IETF78 (slides are in the proceedings) I
asked a question about continuing the current meeting policy (3 in North
America, 2 in Europe, 1 in Asia in two year period (3-2-1) ) or changing to a
1-1-1 policy based on current meeting attendance. The talk included a graph
of attendance by continent for IETF72-IETF78. I was asked to provide this
data to the community.
It is attached. It includes the raw data and a new graph that shows
attendance by percentage. It appears to me that a 1-1-1 meeting policy is
justified by current overall IETF meeting attendance.
Your comments are appreciated.
Bob
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf