ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

2010-09-10 14:06:53



On 10/09/10 7:55 PM, "Alexandru Petrescu" 
<alexandru(_dot_)petrescu(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:

Le 10/09/2010 11:48, Hesham Soliman a écrit :



=>   Who cares, specify it in your product description. The IETF
 doesn't specify how to build products.

Hmm... to me it is a very IETF sensitive issue the Router vs Host.
For example, an ND spec says distinctively what a Host and what a
Router does, e.g. a Host does not respond to Router Solicitation.

=>  Yes and it does so on a per-interface basis, not on a
per-machine basis.

Yes, and the Mobile Router is a Router on its egress interface when
connected at home, as per spec.  It is that interface that needs a
default route automatically configured.

=> Ok, so you're happy with it being half host half router when it's away
from home? If so then let it do the same at home. Otherwise, I don't know
how you want to fix this in this WG.

Hesham


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>