SM,
Eric Burger
Dave Crocker
Marshall Eubanks
Bob Hinden
Ray Pelletier (non-voting)
None of them are new to the IETF. If it requires I* Chairs for the IAOC to
be transparent, something is not right.
But that may not always be the case that all IAOC members have a lot of IETF
experience. We need to have a governance model that works into the future.
I think the I* chairs, in my view bring a broad view of the community and
operational needs based on what's involved in doing their jobs than another
person would not have.
If I understand your arguments, it is also about avoiding a disconnect
between the administrative side of the IETF and the IAB/IESG.
Yes
draft-kolkman-iasa-ex-officio-membership-00 argues for a change to reduce the
workload and make the I* Chair positions more attractive. Would it help if
the IAOC Chair has a liaison position on the IAB and IESG? The IAB and IESG
Chairs can use their discretion to determine which IAOC meetings they should
attend. The IAOC Chair gets a broader view.
The above pushes the workload around instead of addressing the problem. If
this trend continues, the best fit people will turn down I* positions.
It would certainly give the IAOC chair a broader view, but still not the views
of the I* chair. Also, if the I* chairs (3 of 9 voting members) regularly
didn't attend, it would be much harder to get a quorum for a meeting and pass
motions.
Bob
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf