On 5/6/2011 2:29 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
Whether you are or not.., the only way to do this is to stop calling
them "RFC"s. Maybe we should have a "PROP" series for PS docs, and
only give them "RFC" numbers later, when they progress.
Well, you know, the "Not a Standard But Might Be One Later" really are
requesting comments.
seems like that is rather cumbersome phrasing for a label. perhaps we can come
up with a term that is shorter but implies a similar status with regard to now
and later.
hmmm. what about the word 'proposed'?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf