Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)

    > From: "t.petch" <daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com> 

    > I realise that ... you are seeking IETF consensus but what is that
    > if the WG is dead set against it?

If the entire WG is against it, that's enough people to (IMO) prevent IETF
consensus -> no IETF rough consensus for this statement.

        Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf