ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)

2011-07-25 22:45:30
Hi -

From: "Noel Chiappa" <jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Cc: <jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
...
I think we should only mark things as HISTORIC as a recognition of _what has
already happened_ out in the world, not as an attempt to _make something
happen_.
...

Though I think this is a reasonable position, there are examples from
history, such as the "historicization" of RFC 1227, that clearly demonstrate
that the IETF has historically not consistently maintained this position.

Randy

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>