ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments

2012-04-19 19:40:10
Another '+1' from me.

I see the benefits in publishing reports, and I don't object to cleaning up
code-points or allocated resources so long is there is _very_ careful review
before hand.

.. but rushing through this now, could do more harm later.

T.


On 20/04/12 10:01 AM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk(_at_)cloudmark(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Lixia
Zhang
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:48 PM
To: SM
Cc: adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments

The IESG would welcome your thoughts on this draft before they
approve the final text on April 26th.

Could the IESG defer approval by a month for the case study?

I would like to second this suggestion
(or did IESG have any specific reason to rush?)

+1.

-MSK

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>