Hi,
On Apr 19, 2012, at 22:31, Adrian Farrel wrote:
The IESG has been discussing how to tidy up after Experimental RFCs.
We have developed the following draft IESG statement. This does not
represent a change in process, and continues to value Experimental RFCs
as an important part of the IETF process. It does, however, seek to
encourage documentation of the conclusion of experiments.
any IESG statement would only cover Experimental RFCs on the IETF Stream, right?
Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature