Hi Russ,
I agree with the proposal totally, but my confusions are: a) if we are
having the current document RFC4677 on the Tao-web, could we not
obsolete the RFC4677 until we get a final updated agreed RFC other
than the submitted I-D, Or the first web-document approved to obsolete
the RFC4677.
b) If we are making a new IETF web-document process, could we have the
I-D submited to include how the community will decide and how the
editor will decide.
sorry for any disturb,
Abdussalam
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>
To: IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:08:40 -0400
This URL <http://www.ietf.org/tao> will bring up the current document.
It works exactly the same as <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html>.
This means that <http://www.ietf.org/tao/archive> cannot be used as
suggested on this thread.
I propose the following URLs for the Tao:
- current Tao: <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html>
- draft Tao: <http://www.ietf.org/tao-possible-revision.html>
- archive entries: <http://www.ietf.org/tao-archive/tao-YYYYMMDD.html>
Russ