Re: So, where to repeat?
2012-08-09 13:55:31
On 8/9/2012 11:37 AM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
Frankfurt is a city in Germany. I believe the IETF has never been
...
I've found it relatively inexpensive, clean and very easy to get to.
Ole's comment was reflecting secretariat and IAOC research.
Individual experience can be very misleading here. Sometimes, yes, it
can point to approaches that haven't been considered. But the
'sometimes' is meant as a polite way of saying 'almost never'.
As someone who has challenged the IETF's venue selection process
vigorously for 20 years, I am forced to admit that any possible problems
in the process seem to be strategic, not tactical. I haven't seen any
evidence that the current process obtains distorted data or makes silly
decisions in the /details/ of researching or arranging a given city.
Anyone thinking otherwise needs to employ the full set of requirements
for an IETF meeting, not merely a stray, isolated item, such as
discounted hotel price.
Other than those two tidbits about it, I've no idea what is to be
accomplished by someone's randomly throwing out the names of cities for
a discussion like this, especially when threads like these always have a
great deal of trouble staying focused on the /principle/ rather than
haggling the details.
The principle would be to go to aviation hubs so as to minimize the
collective pain. Most people from the US going to Prague, would have a
connection in Frankfurt, so a meeting in Frankfurt would reduce the
amount of flights.
This is why I threw out a "not so random" city name - Frankfurt.
Indeed, random was the wrong word. That word is often used incorrectly.
The correct word is "arbitrary".
It is frankly entirely arbitrary to suggest a particular city, in terms
of the a directed discussion about the /approach/ of choosing cities.
It presumes that the existing processes haven't researched most choices
for Europe, Asia, or North America.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), (continued)
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Geoff Mulligan
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Dave Crocker
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Geoff Mulligan
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Dave Crocker
- Re: So, where to repeat?, Dave Crocker
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Yoav Nir
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Ole Jacobsen
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Arturo Servin
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Dhruv Dhody
- Re: So, where to repeat?, Geoff Mulligan
- Re: So, where to repeat?,
Dave Crocker <=
- Re: So, where to repeat?, John C Klensin
- Re: So, where to repeat?, Tim Bray
- Re: So, where to repeat?, Ole Jacobsen
- RE: So, where to repeat?, Richard Shockey
- Re: So, where to repeat?, Yoav Nir
- RE: So, where to repeat?, Richard Shockey
- Re: So, where to repeat?, joel jaeggli
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Ole Jacobsen
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Geoff Mulligan
- Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity), Ole Jacobsen
|
|
|