Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

So I'm confused...  We're we talking about the possibility of sticking to one 
European city, one north American city and one Asian city and not picking 
various cities throughout the world.

I was just suggesting picking -a- city in Europe that was not multiple hops 
from most US hubs.  Prague, while a nice city, isn't one hop and as Dave 
pointed out this adds costs and time, just as would choosing a US city that is 
multiple hops from major European hubs.

I loved Vancouver and would go back there over and over again.  I like 
Minneapolis for convenience and venue and would go there every time.

I liked Prague, both times, but had trouble getting there both times and it did 
add time and cost.

Geoff



On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Ole Jacobsen <ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> What are you talking about? Of course we are "considering" all of 
> those places. We are going to London in 2014 for example, we went to 
> Paris this year. But, like with all popular places, finding venues 
> available for OUR dates is not easy. Add to that the costs and you 
> will understand why we don't meet in London or Paris or Frankfurt or 
> Amsterdam more often.
>
> Ole
>
>
> Ole J. Jacobsen
> Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> Cisco Systems
> Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
> E-mail: ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> Skype: organdemo
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
>
> > So then why not consider, London, Paris (not the Concorde 
> > Lafayette), Frankfurt, Amsterdam?