Re: Just so I'm clear2012-10-25 02:46:50On 24/10/2012 20:34, Doug Barton wrote: ... ... Nothing in the text suggests an unfettered right of creating new definitions of "vacant." You mean, new compared to the first definition in Merriam-Webster.com? 1: not occupied by an incumbent, possessor, or officer <a vacant office> <vacant thrones> Objectively and factually, that seems to be the case. The IAOC is actually going an extra mile rather than simply informing NomCom that the seat has become vacant. Brian
|
|