ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Just so I'm clear

2012-10-25 02:46:50
On 24/10/2012 20:34, Doug Barton wrote:
...
... Nothing in the text suggests an
unfettered right of creating new definitions of "vacant."

You mean, new compared to the first definition in Merriam-Webster.com?

1: not occupied by an incumbent, possessor, or officer <a vacant office> 
<vacant thrones>

Objectively and factually, that seems to be the case. The IAOC is actually
going an extra mile rather than simply informing NomCom that the seat
has become vacant.

    Brian


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>