Has anyone bothered to ask counsel for an opinion about the issues StJohns
raised?
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:47 AM
To: Doug Barton
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Just so I'm clear
On 24/10/2012 20:34, Doug Barton wrote:
...
... Nothing in the text suggests an
unfettered right of creating new definitions of "vacant."
You mean, new compared to the first definition in Merriam-Webster.com?
1: not occupied by an incumbent, possessor, or officer <a vacant office>
<vacant thrones>
Objectively and factually, that seems to be the case. The IAOC is actually
going an extra mile rather than simply informing NomCom that the seat has
become vacant.
Brian