At 2:03 PM -0500 3/11/13, Mary Barnes wrote:
To suggest that
someone is not qualified to be an AD because they shed tears in a
contentious situation is unacceptable IMHO.
I'm confused as to why that would be considered a reason not to
appoint someone, regardless of gender. Is it because tears makes
others uncomfortable or is it seen as an inability to be tough when
needed? It doesn't make sense to me.
Especially because we've had ADs who screamed, yelled, threw things
in WG meetings.
--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
There is always an easy solution to every human problem -- neat,
plausible, and wrong. --H.L. Mencken