On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Noel Chiappa
<jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu> wrote:
Why not just say directly that 'to prevent "capture", no more than X% of
the NomCom may work for a single organization' (where X is 15% or so, so
that even if a couple collude, they still can't get control).
There are already controls for that, but folks who engage in games such as
this generally make use of consultants/proxies/etc. which are not at all
apparent. I'm not citing this as a huge risk, but one which could occur
if the in-person requirement drops to a single meeting. (i.e. due to the
large pool of remote participants that one could enlist and fund a single
on-site attendance if the goal was to seat an particular IAB or IESG member.)
FYI,
/John
Disclaimers: My views alone (& not part of any group seeking NomCom capture...
:-)