Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials
2013-07-28 08:38:51
Douglas,
Totally agree that a requirement is that F2F and remote are equals.
I even believe that a presentation-less format (as the described) is
better for remote participants.
About the minor changes, perhaps. Not very convinced but it could be.
In the same line, what about to have the presentation-material
attached to the last htmlized version of the draft?
In that way people going to a wg meeting (local or remote) knows
where to find the last version of the presentation and if this were
submited in the same way than drafts, then WG chairs would have less work.
Regards,
as
On 7/28/13 3:20 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
On Jul 28, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Arturo Servin
<arturo(_dot_)servin(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
That may work as well.
It depends on the time that the presenters have to make the material
available.
The important is to have discussion-material available in advance. It
could be a presentation or a video (I would personally prefer a
presentation because I can quickly scan it for important things)
Dear Arturo,
Emphasis should be to ensure equal status for remote participants. For
reasonable remote participation, presentation material should be made
available in advance. It seems reasonable to allow minor edits within a day
or even hours before the meeting starts.
To do this, video and audio control should be centralized within the meeting
room and virtualized in the cloud when necessary. A dual core Atom processor
should be all that is needed. Rather than using an audio bridge with
multiple simultaneous audio and video feeds, a strategy should be developed
that suits those in the meeting venue as as well as those who are remote.
For this, there should be a minor level of automation available to facilitate
selection of individuals permitted to speak. This control should not need to
be done at the meeting venue, but in the cloud as well.
Regards,
Douglas Otis
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, (continued)
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Keith Moore
- RE: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, l.wood
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Melinda Shore
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Yoav Nir
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Arturo Servin
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Arturo Servin
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Douglas Otis
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials,
Arturo Servin <=
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info), Randy Bush
- Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info), Ted Lemon
- Re: [edu-team] Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Mirjam Kuehne
- Re: [Team] Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info), Lorenzo Miniero
Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Brian E Carpenter
- Oh look! [Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Oh look! [Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials], John C Klensin
- Re: Oh look! [Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials], SM
- Re: Oh look! [Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials], Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Oh look! [Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials], Arturo Servin
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Douglas Otis |
Next by Date: |
Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Ted Lemon |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, Douglas Otis |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials (was: IETF87 Audio Streaming Info), Randy Bush |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|