ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis

2013-09-01 00:54:05
Hi William,
At 21:41 31-08-2013, William McCall wrote:
Just one point that irks me a bit about this draft... this draft would imply the violation of the code upon those who do (however inadvertently) are 1) Native English speakers and 2) use slang of some nature (which is quite arbitrary). I'd ask for the original phrasing to be more or less preserved (I see a few wording changes worthwhile) to avoid the implied absurdity.

The application of Lars' comment would potentially provide for penalty here, so I think it is worthwhile to fight this point now.

The original phrasing is as follows:

  "English is the de facto language of the IETF, but it is not the
   native language of many IETF participants.  Native English
   speakers attempt to speak clearly and a bit slowly and to limit
   the use of slang in order to accommodate the needs of all
   listeners."

The draft reuses the text.  That text could be rewritten as:

   English is the de facto language of the IETF, but it is not the
   native language of many IETF participants.  Native English
   participants attempt to accommodate the needs of other
   participants by communicating clearly.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy