On 21/09/2013, at 11:33 AM, Masataka Ohta
<mohta(_at_)necom830(_dot_)hpcl(_dot_)titech(_dot_)ac(_dot_)jp> wrote:
Cost for monitoring should be large?
Then, protocols not have any authoritative specification and
should never be standardized and there should be no central
authority to manage different versions of the protocols.
From a PRISM viewpoint, the cost of parsing different formats, understanding
different wire protocols, etc. is trivial. The real cost is negotiating with /
bullying each provider into giving access. Especially if it's not hosted or
doing business in a country you control.
I should be able to choose my own data sync server, whether
it's one I run, or one run by my paranoid friend, or by a
local company, or a US company that's in bed with the NSA.
The only secure way is to run your own.
That's a very simplistic definition of "secure."
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/