Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

On 10/22/13 6:15 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:

What happened at PyCon is a really strong argument for having an
escalation path other than twitter.


That is a very, very, very good point.

Melinda

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, (continued) Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Donald Eastlake Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Eliot Lear Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Bjoern Hoehrmann Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Theodore Ts'o Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Fred Baker (fred) Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Theodore Ts'o Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Fred Baker (fred) RE: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, l.wood Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Ted Lemon Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Melinda Shore <= Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Cullen Jennings Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Theodore Ts'o Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Ted Lemon Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Theodore Ts'o Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Scott Brim Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Abdussalam Baryun Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Theodore Ts'o Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Bjoern Hoehrmann Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Cullen Jennings Fwd: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy, Harald Alvestrand