RE: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

because Amanda espouses a viewpoint you agree with?

http://www.technologywoman.com/2013/03/24/digging-beneath-the-surface-that-amanda-blum-article-on-adria-richards-is-not-what-it-seems/

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On 
Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred) [fred(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
Sent: 22 October 2013 10:51
To: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

> One hint --- we should definitely try to pursuade folks not to try to
> get a decision based on the specific facts of a particulate dispute
> via the court of public opinion:
>
>       "Adria Richards, PyCon, and How We All Lost"
>       http://amandablumwords.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/
Hmm. I might want to hear more from Amanda Blum.