I think if we want to do a practice solution roadmap together we need the
draft to add more editors for diversity or include at least two more
(recommending Dave and Melinda). Secondly the draft to state relating to
the current plan practice what IAB and IESG should do? And what WGs should
do? Is there a team work between the bodies or there is continuous
separation as old days? Why the draft only states for IETF
community confirmation and responsibilities and ignores the IAB and IESG
responsibilities in future actions? Couldn't this draft be a joint work of
all bodies?
IMHO the previous IESG and IAB are responsible for the defined attacks as
well and they should take different strategies in working with IETF
community. The draft should be written in a way to guide bottom designs but
also upper designs.
AB