On 2/23/2014 10:49 PM, l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk wrote:
How many IETF meetings have you attended, and what experience do you base this
recommendation on?
...
From: ietf [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Abdussalam Baryun
[abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: 24 February 2014 03:43
To: ietf
Subject: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face
discussions
...
I suggest in London that you assign only maximum 10 minutes present per WG
draft and maximum 5 minute for individual draft (as limit policy).
I'll suggest that that question is primarily ad hominem and even if it
weren't, it's not a particularly helpful line of response. It doesn't
matter what the background is of the person asking the question.
What matters is whether a rigid rule limiting time per topic is helpful.
I think it isn't. Some topics require more. Some require less.
The usual focus in IETF discussions about meeting management is,
instead, about /how/ time is used, rather than how much of it, notably
pressing to avoid tutorial or reportorial content, instead focusing on
discussion of pending items, such as those creating an impasse.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net