Hi Brian,
At 20:40 21-02-2014, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
One difficulty is that what is "unwanted" is very sensitive
to cultural and linguistic subtleties. Also, if (for example) I
were to repeatedly point out substantive errors in somebody's
IETF work, or even syntax errors in their English, where is the
line between legitimate discussion and review and objectionable
harassment?
I am responding to the above as it is one of the difficulties
encountered in an interaction with another person.
If you repeatedly point out substantive errors in somebody's work,
that person might perceive that as victimization. I'd say try and
keep it impersonal as far as possible. It is better to avoid point
out too many syntax errors if you are not sure whether the person
uses English as a first language.
I'll separate legitimate discussion and review. In the review you
can easily point out the substantive errors or syntax errors. I am
not sure how to explain how the discussion can be a problem. I would
leave that to experience.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy