On 02/21/2014 04:51 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Keith Moore
<moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com <mailto:moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com>> wrote:
Agree. We have too many piddly rules that serve little or no
purpose already. As long as neither the identifier nor the
listed authors in the document are misleading, I don't see the
need to impose further restrictions on them.
I feel very strongly, and furthermore I think it's perfectly self
evident - the form of a draft name, and the number of authors, and -
most especially - the way in which these authors are listed is of
vital importance, and there is no doubt in my mind whatsoever that I
have something to say about it. It's key to note, as a matter of
principle.
Silly me, I think the draft should be evaluated based on its content,
rather than on who claims to have written it.
Keith