I'm listening here. You can always email the IAB, too.
Eliot
On 3/6/14, 11:04 AM, Leaf Yeh wrote:
I guess both IAB & the speakers need a channel for feedback.
*From:*ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] *On Behalf Of *Murray S.
Kucherawy
*Sent:* Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:13 AM
*To:* Dave Crocker
*Cc:* IETF Discussion Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net
<mailto:dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>> wrote:
That said, one might argue that it /should/ be required that the
IAB explicitly engage in a pre-presentation discussion with the
speaker about this issue. (I'm making the wild assumption that
the IAB folk will, in fact, be facile with such an exercise...)
I think it might be helpful to engage a couple of random IETF
participants prior to plenary to see if the IAB overlooked anything.
This is not the first time the IAB vetted a presentation that was
ultimately not well received by the audience.
By the way, one of the other places folks should be encouraged to
ask about or offer suggestions for work in the IETF is from the
floor, after the presentation.
It will be quite a bit more productive than attacking the speaker...
Since that can be a charged discussion, I think it's unfortunate that
the place to bring it up is while said speaker is still in the room.
-MSK