Re: IETF working language

I suggest in return that we can ignore statements in English that is too
complicated for people that are not skilled in the language.

We are after correct _simple_ english that maximizes the number of
people that can participate.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English>

   Patrik

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, (continued) Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Riccardo Bernardini Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, t.p. Re: IETF working language, Arturo Servin RE: IETF working language, l.wood Re: IETF working language, Arturo Servin Re: IETF working language, Brian Trammell Re: IETF working language, Dave Cridland Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: IETF working language, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE RE: IETF working language, Fatai Zhang Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: IETF working language, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE Re: IETF working language, Patrik Fältström <= RE: IETF working language, l.wood Re: [eX-bulk] : IETF working language, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE Re: [eX-bulk] : IETF working language, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: [eX-bulk] : IETF working language, Riccardo Bernardini Re: IETF working language, Dale R. Worley

Previous by Date:	Re: IETF working language, Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)
Next by Date:	RE: IETF working language, l.wood
Previous by Thread:	Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: IETF working language, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
Next by Thread:	RE: IETF working language, l.wood
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]