Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protoco

On 29 maj 2014, at 22:48, David Conrad <drc(_at_)virtualized(_dot_)org> wrote:

> I'm disappointed that people would argue that Yet Another IETF RFC is 
> required to get folks to do stuff they already know they should be doing.
Aha, then here is where I think we have different opinion.

I do not see this draft be anything people think will change things. I see 
personally this be an updated version of the RFC stating what IETF do believe 
should be implemented.

Once again, the enforcement is somewhere else.

But if whatever the enforcement is to refer to is not correct, then it is 
absolutely for certain the enforcement will not happen.

So, phew, I do not think we are very far away from each other this time either. 
;-)

   Patrik

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail