Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants

John,

We were able to make somethings happen for this meeting (see below), but more 
importantly
it will become routine for future meetings.

Please continue to provide feedback so we can get this to be a real service
to those who participate remotely and for those actually in the session.

Best
Ray

> From: Alexa Morris <amorris(_at_)amsl(_dot_)com>
> Subject: [Recentattendees] Attending IETF 91 Remotely
> Date: November 9, 2014 at 10:27:44 AM HST
> To: ietf-announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, 91all(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, 
> recentattendees(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
>
> Welcome to IETF 91! You can remotely attend all IETF 91 sessions, plenaries 
> and tutorials using Meetecho. 
>
> Please register as a remote attendee (there is no cost) here: 
> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/register.html.
>
> Meetecho live streaming schedule and session archives links are at: 
> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/remote-participation.html#Meetecho.
>
> Download meeting materials here: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/91/materials.html.
>
> If you want to present remotely, please send email to 
> ietf-team(_at_)meetecho(_dot_)com and the Meetecho Team will do their best to 
> accommodate you.
>
> More information on remote participation can be found at 
> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/remote-participation.html. 
>
> Regards,
> Alexa
On Nov 8, 2014, at 5:07 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> wrote:

> --On Saturday, November 08, 2014 04:58 -1000 Ray Pelletier
> <rpelletier(_at_)isoc(_dot_)org> wrote:
>
> > John
> >
> > Thanks for the nudge. I'll look into this today to see what we
> > can get done for tomorrow. 
> Ray,
>
> While "tomorrow" is better than "not at all", people who aren't
> there need to plan schedules too.  Given time zone differences,
> day jobs, etc., they may even need to plan more than people who
> are on site.  The time to get this organized, announced, and
> meeting materials online should certainly be no later than the
> expectations about posting of WG agendas.
>
> thanks,
>   john