ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard

2014-12-10 21:29:44
On Dec 10, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Doug Royer <douglasroyer(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
So the expectation is that ISP's will replace your NAT/router with one that 
meets this specification? Why would they just not replace it with a IPv6 one? 
I still see no time
to implement gain if this is the plan.

A+P is available in OpenWRT.   And you aren't listening: I just said that this 
makes the most sense in a dual stack environment.   Dual stack means IPv4+IPv6. 
  In an A+P deployment, the expectation is that you get better service over 
IPv6, but still need some residual support for IPv4, for which A+P is adequate.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>