I was not understanding the problem, until I got 5 copies of the same
notice about a draft this morning.
The notice was explicitly sent to draft.all, the working group, and the
working group chairs.
So .all sent one to the chairs, the explicit chairs listing sent one to
the chairs, and of course the chairs are on the working group list.
So part of the problem is that both chairs and the working group got
listed in the notify line:
Send notices to: ggx(_at_)gigix(_dot_)net,
draft-ietf-lisp-introduction(_dot_)all(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, lisp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org,
lisp-chairs(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Since I doubt that my co-chair made that change, I presume tooling did
so. But listing the chairs and the working group is not actually
helpful in most cases (I can imagine corner cases, but ...)
So I am not sure how it produced 5, but there does seem to be some truly
unnecessary duplication here.
Yours,
Joel
On 2/11/15 12:24 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 2015-02-11 18:11, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/11/2015 8:52 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
The aliases that are created currently are as follows (except that
aliases that have empty expansions are not created):
...
Besides the email you just sent, where is this documented?
We're working on both help pages for the aliases with this information,
and pages that will let your search/inspect the generated aliases. They
will be part of the next datatracker release.
A newbie should be able to easily learn of these addresses and where
they go.
At a minimum, I suggest replicated the relevant parts of the text you
just sent on the page:
http://www.ietf.org/id-info/
Sound reasonable, I guess. I'll Bcc the secretariat on this email.
Regards,
Henrik