Am Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2015, 18:31:13 schrieb Cullen Jennings:
The internet has already been harmed by too many years of security that is
not turned on.
If so - why not using signatures in YOUR mails btw.?
HTTPS x509 SSL/TLS isn't simply "security on" (this is btw THE major technical
misunderstanding/-interpretation of HTTPS out today, leading to huge new
scurity holes and attack vectors in practice) - this may be correct for i.e.
with telnet->ssh or partly SMTP-> SMTPs/TLS (where it is still not applicable
and/or applicated correctly until today in most practical cases), just btw...
Take a hum at next plenary and find out if people want the IETF to actually
use security or not.
...sorry, but This was NOT a question here - assume you mis- (or even not)
readed correctly.
--
---
Niels Dettenbach
Syndicat IT & Internet
http://www.syndicat.com
PGP: https://syndicat.com/pub_key.asc
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.