On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:42:23PM +0000,
Edward Lewis <edward(_dot_)lewis(_at_)icann(_dot_)org> wrote
a message of 202 lines which said:
The document defines the use of the name by referring to a couple of
references, none of which appears to be published in a way that can
be referenced except by URL.
First, RFC 6761 is silent about the characteristics of the
documentation to include in such a draft. RFC 6761 is very specific
about "in each of the seven categories below, what special treatment,
if any, is to be applied" but never mandated a specific type of
external references.
Second, I much prefer an URL (a few seconds after, I have the document
and I can read it) to... (incoming troll) a DOI or other kind of
reference that I may or may not be able to dereference.