ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Yokohama Hotels Update was Re: [BOFChairs] IETF 94 - Registration and Hotel Information - no availablity

2015-08-18 17:34:21
Receiving more E-Mail does not equate to "knowing more."

Just an observation...  :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Toerless 
Eckert
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 5:06 PM
To: Stewart Bryant
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Yokohama Hotels Update was Re: [BOFChairs] IETF 94 - Registration 
and Hotel Information - no availablity

The main problem with the experience was that there was seemingly no sufficient 
upfront communication about the circumstances to set expectations of 
participants right. Having made the same mistake i'll hardly want to blame 
anyone at IETF organization, just ask for the future to err on the side of 
overloading us with details about what you deal with rather than on the "as 
little as we feel is necessary" side.

Short of knowing more, this whole discussion is just an ideal example for a 
friends signature:

"It's much easier to have an opinion if you do not understand the problem"

Cheers
    Toerless

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:59:00PM +0100, Stewart Bryant wrote:
On 17/08/2015 21:57, Ray Pelletier wrote:
All;

Here is where things stand.

1.  "Headquarters Hotel?

Our Host, WIDE, is attempting to obtain more guest rooms in the 
InterContinental Yokohama Grand.

The InterContinental Yokohama Grand has 475 standard rooms, but would 
only allow us to book 300 rooms on the peak nights of Monday and 
Tuesday.  They said they had to accommodate their existing corporate 
and airline contracts.

Wednesday and Thursdays were contracted for fewer rooms, 289 and 250. 
We contracted for the rooms using the usual Bell Curve, which 
typically reflects that some folks depart on Wednesday and more on 
Thursday.  This was a mistake on our part.  if those rooms had been 
available we should have contracted for the max we could get.

Ray

How do these numbers compare to the past three meetings?

- Stewart

--
---
Toerless Eckert, eckert(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>