ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

2016-05-24 10:29:50
Folks,

I don’t want to comment on the specific issues brought up by the most recent 
emails. But I think it is of course necessary to consider things that affect 
the ability to enter, safety (possibly including usual human activities that 
people do outside meetings anyway, families travelling along), etc. Those are 
factors that have a direct effect on attendees. Some of these issues may affect 
parts of the community, others may affect the whole community. But all of those 
are very valid concerns. We do not have an ability to avoid _all_ issues, but 
we definitely should try our best.

However, there is another category of issue that I would classify as 
in-principle issues. I might for instance have some opinions about a country’s 
policies or practices, but me visiting that country am reasonably not affected 
by those policies. I hope when we evaluate meetings for the practical can-meet 
aspect (with everything that is implied by that), not for the long list of 
in-principle issues.

Jari


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>