Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
2016-06-10 07:10:03
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } We should make the outcome of this debate more visible. Event
apparel should be
I SAIDI'D BOYCOTT SINGAPORE AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS LOUSY
T-SHIRT
100 IETFs!
(I do not second Ohta's opinions, and he misunderstands mine. ALL participants'
families are equally unimportant; I left mine on the other side of the planet
years ago...)
Lloyd Wood
lloyd(_dot_)wood(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk
On Friday, June 10, 2016, 1:30 AM, Harald Alvestrand
<harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no> wrote:
On 06/08/2016 08:13 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
I understand that, but then all our debate has been 99% useless.
At LEAST we need to make sure that the Singapore government know that we go
there most probably because we have no other choice at this point in time for
planning another venue, and that we will most probably not return if the laws
keep the same.
For some reason I'm reminded of the (apparent) belief of old NetNews denizens
that one could shape the Real World by rearranging the hierarchy of NetNews
group names (remember soc.religion.islam.ahmadi?)
While the IETF has great influence over many things, this idea vastly
overestimates our influence.
I'd be surprised if any government official in the parts of Singapore
government that deal with this kind of issues even knows we're coming. We may
have IT-related contacts, and telling them that we've had this debate will
cause no harm, but the threat of IETF formally boycotting Singapore is ....
less than awe-inspiring.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Meeting discussions (was: IETF 100, IAOC perspective), (continued)
- Meeting discussions (was: IETF 100, IAOC perspective), S Moonesamy
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Robin Wilton
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Jakob Heitz
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective,
Lloyd Wood <=
- Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Masataka Ohta
Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, John Levine
Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective, Masataka Ohta
- Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective], Melinda Shore
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective], lloyd.wood
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective], Randy Bush
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective], Jari Arkko
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective], Masataka Ohta
- Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective], JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
|
|
|