Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC

Christian Huitema <huitema(_at_)huitema(_dot_)net> wrote:
    > On Friday, November 4, 2016 8:43 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: =20
    >> There is another option: the people who live in a p=3Dreject policy =
    > regime
    >> could use a different email address for IETF participation.  It's not
    >> =
    > a
    >> choice I like very much though.

    > Been there, done that. It has quite a few nasty side effects. You
    > easily = end up also sending work related e-mail from a non-corporate
    > account, = for example when you forward an email from a WG list to a
    > colleague at = work. That's against many companies' internal

Yes, and yet, the legal council doesn't get involved in the p=reject
policy decision?  The point here is to make the legal people wake up to
what is going on.

Creating corp.example.com or eng.example.com with a p=quarantine or other
policy is not such huge decision for a place considering p=reject.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature