-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 4, 2016 8:43 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
There is another option: the people who live in a p=reject policy regime
could use a different email address for IETF participation. It's not a
choice I like very much though.
Been there, done that. It has quite a few nasty side effects. You easily end up
also sending work related e-mail from a non-corporate account, for example when
you forward an email from a WG list to a colleague at work. That's against many
companies' internal policies. Thinks about consequences for example during
legal actions, when the opposing party wants to discover all mail related to a
particular topic. Does using a parallel server amounts to willful hiding of
documents? Are you in contempt of court? Should you store your personal mail on
company server so it can be searched? Bottom line, that's indeed not a choice I
like much either.
- -- Christian Huitema
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Using gpg4o v5.0.7.7563 - http://www.gpg4o.com/
Charset: utf-8
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYHhUIAAoJELba05IUOHVQSX4H/22Np5iTJdf5F9N10Y9vVBCJ
a/rqPQwK9DzvdDQRlJFA+Kn6+PRGPK4siI6Nx6eYo578t7WMJUCYFwRX0YJBRZAm
Y8kYBdO5QS/h2U0px67FEyZxask3gsoCW+gPZK1l6ER8ygcTaC3zlKxxbLgUFzXz
8tEIisUr7Xo9y497RKBVzIIpIFZ0wQtH2GipGfFU4p3LOKISnwnUugHePHU3Wt5F
0NLoUVn7c58A40o/B5k2rty2u3q+1m5JUq5iDDMwhumY/qoXvt1D6Ka6m8CkCRZA
OG+xFC62aKIv6IM4D6DlU34fEDt8sxWkGGXb5rIlemlUCItJWKLccyqyFH7wi+Q=
=H+SS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----