On Feb 14, 2017, at 6:01 PM, Pete Resnick
<presnick(_at_)qti(_dot_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> wrote:
To Ted's point, indulging folk who 'did not have time' to participate
earlier is frankly abusive of all those who did.
Yeah, I don't find Ted's point at all convincing either. On the other hand,
if the WG didn't seek out required expertise and someone does notice a
showstopper, that's not abusive. The WG screwed up.
Wow. You must have a lot more free time than I do, Pete. My experience is
that there are lots of things that get worked on in working groups that I don't
even have time to be aware of, and 99% of the time the fact that I wasn't aware
of them is not a problem at all. But 1% of the time it is, and last call is
(hopefully) where I become aware of that and say something. Are you really
calling this abusive?