On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Job Snijders <job(_at_)ntt(_dot_)net> wrote:
For the benefit of the working group, what Lorenzo describes is the
following in linux-lingo:
[...]
Actually no, what I was saying was literally to leave the addresses as /64s
and configure the first-hop router to route the /126 to the prefix. The
hosts won't care.
I also fear that the moment "disunited addressing & routing" become
commonplace, you'll find your devices on the dirty end of a
'/120 routed + /64 addressed'-link and have a dysfunctional experience.
As far as I know there is no way to signal host "only a /120 out of this
/64 is routed".
The host doesn't really need to know.