On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:37:52PM +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Job Snijders <job(_at_)ntt(_dot_)net> wrote:
For the benefit of the working group, what Lorenzo describes is the
following in linux-lingo:
[...]
Actually no, what I was saying was literally to leave the addresses as
/64s and configure the first-hop router to route the /126 to the
prefix. The hosts won't care.
And how to protect the interconnection between the first-hop router and
the edge-of-your-network? or the edge of the network itself? I suspect
this idea is still in a theoretical stage.
Can you point me to a RIPE, NANOG or APRICOT talk where this idea is
shared in its entirety?
Kind regards,
Job