Re: The need for two headers

mail-ng

Re: The need for two headers

2004-02-07 10:00:27

This discussion is *off-topic*. This list assumes that there will bea next generation of email. If you want to discuss fixing the currentgeneration of mail content, take it to the ietf-822 mailing list (see<http://www.imc.org/ietf-822>).


As list-mom, I'm going to try to keep focus here, even if a bit forcefully.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Andrzej Filip Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Paul Hoffman / IMC <= Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Brett Watson Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: The need for two headers, Steven F Siirila Re: The need for two headers, Brett Watson Re: The need for two headers, Martin Duerst Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch

Previous by Date:	Re: VMN: Virtual Mail Networks (ESMTP), Paul Hoffman / IMC
Next by Date:	Re: VMN: Virtual Mail Networks (ESMTP), Andrzej Filip
Previous by Thread:	Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch
Next by Thread:	Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]