At 1:01 PM +0100 2/7/04, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
I'd propose to split the information which was stored
in the RFC822 header into two, completely separate headers
(maybe "header" isn't a good word anymore):
At 6:28 PM +0100 2/7/04, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
So could you just explain a little bit what you like to focus
on if not on such matters?
You proposed splitting the RFC822 headers in two. We are not dealing
with RFC822 headers. We are dealing with a completely new set of
protocols.
If you feel that there are requirements for what are headers in
RFC822, state the requirement. We aren't talking about protocols yet,
so assuming that a message is going to have one, two, or more
"headers" is out of scope. What is in scope is what a message needs
to have (and, of course, how it gets transported).
Be a good mom and tell the kids what you expect instead of just
beating them.
Ahem. "Beating them" in this case would be removing bad kids from the
list, which I didn't do yet.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium