Re: The need for two headers


Brett Watson <famous-mail-ng(_at_)nutters(_dot_)org> writes:

In my view, this blending of data bundles is a mistake that we don't
want to repeat in mail-ng.


Agreed very strongly.  One simple reason for doing this is that we
want to be able to encrypt the payload, but we obviously can't
end-to-end encrypt the routing metadata.
-- 
  __  Paul Crowley
\/ o\ sig(_at_)paul(_dot_)ciphergoth(_dot_)org
/\__/ http://www.ciphergoth.org/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: The need for two headers, (continued) Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Brett Watson Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: The need for two headers, Steven F Siirila Re: The need for two headers, Brett Watson Re: The need for two headers, Martin Duerst Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch Re: The need for two headers, Paul Crowley <= Re: The need for two headers, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: The need for two headers, Paul Crowley Re: The need for two headers, Martin Duerst Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch

Previous by Date:	Re: Challenge Response ?, Paul Crowley
Next by Date:	Re: Challenge Response ?, william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
Previous by Thread:	Re: The need for two headers, Hadmut Danisch
Next by Thread:	Re: The need for two headers, Paul Hoffman / IMC
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]