draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header currently makes an informative reference to draft-crocker-email-arch, which is not yet published. Should this be removed? I think I'm concerned that the RFC editor will require it to be a reference to something published, not a work-in-progress. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Last Call: draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header (Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] [I-D.DRAFT-CROCKER-EMAIL-ARCH], Alexey Melnikov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Last Call: draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header (Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status) to Proposed Standard, Jim Fenton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] [I-D.DRAFT-CROCKER-EMAIL-ARCH], Alexey Melnikov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |