Douglas Otis wrote:
This is abusing the iprev method when reverse DNS is not examined. There is no result that says "skipped" just to note the IP address.
I concur that it's not the intended use, but that doesn't mean the IP address thus reported is incorrect. You could still use it if all you want is that information. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Seeking consensus on MUA use, SM |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Seeking consensus on MUA use, Scott Kitterman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Seeking consensus on MUA use, SM |
Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Seeking consensus on MUA use, Murray S. Kucherawy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |