mail-vet-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Seeking consensus on MUA use

2008-12-14 15:12:23
MUA design aside, the document should be target neutral with a note that 
content is just in time based relevance with a limited shelf life.
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc
404-847-6397



-----Original Message-----
From: mail-vet-discuss-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org on behalf of J D Falk
Sent: Sun 12/14/2008 10:03 AM
To: mail-vet-discuss(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Seeking consensus on MUA use
 
On 13/12/2008 02:13, "Victor Duchovni" 
<Victor(_dot_)Duchovni(_at_)morganstanley(_dot_)com>
wrote:

What does the group think?

Don't know about the group, but I personally think that MUAs don't
need this, and would likely misuse it. Filters between the MUA and
MTA do need IPs for reputation lookups, but this specification may
not be the best vehicle.

*agree*

In other words, -1 to the proposed expansion of scope that Murray was asking
about.





_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>