One can set an -x flag to capture the original outbound border sending IP
address and that information is certainly available to the MUA but I dont think
this document is the place to discuss what to do with that information within
the MUA
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc
404-847-6397
-----Original Message-----
From: mail-vet-discuss-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org on behalf of SM
Sent: Fri 12/12/2008 4:40 PM
To: mail-vet-discuss(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Seeking consensus on MUA use
At 11:47 12-12-2008, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
It has been suggested that an MUA might wish to make further evaluations
based upon the IP address of the MTA relaying the message in to the border
MTA and, therefore, this specification should enable that by including the
relaying IP address as detected by the border along with all of the other
result data. That information could then be compared to blacklists or
whitelists, used to query reputation, etc. by the MUA displaying the
message.
Do you mean that the draft should specify a new method for passing
the relaying IP address to the MUA? Can't that be done with iprev?
BTW, the information from blacklists may be out of date by the time
the MUA processes the message.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html