nmh-workers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Ready to roll a new release?

2006-01-06 09:37:26
In message <200601060400.k0640KxR019910@succubus.panacea.null.org>, Joel 
Reicher writes:

Unless I've misunderstood the other posts in the thread, it is not
nmh requiring GNU m4, but autoconf for when you regenerate the configure
script. It is, indeed, the case that GNU autoconf requires GNU m4.

This would be an "issue" for any package where you wanted to regenerate
the configure script, but doing so is not part of a standard build.

Indeed, it seems that GNU m4 is required to regenerate the configure
script; that is not a problem at all as the nmh source code will include
a ready to use autoconf script.  But once applied the patch that fixes
the issues with nmh-1.2, non-GNU m4 flavours (at least the one in BSDs)
complain about an unmatched bracket.

Previously, I was able to run "./configure", "make" and "make install"
on machines that do not have GNU m4 installed (e.g., machines with a
fresh NetBSD install).

Again, I believe that it is possible I did something wrong when regenerating
the configure script.  Why is m4 required to run "./configure"?  It can be
my fault, perhaps I did an incomplete configure script regeneration.

What I see is that, after regenerating the configure script and making
a new "tarball" with an updated "configure", I need GNU m4 to run the
configure script and compile nmh.

Cheers,
Igor.


_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>